Quantcast

Seven reasons to kill plan to widen East Avenue

Send signed letters to news@nancyonnorwalk.com

Send signed letters to [email protected]

Peter Libre is co-chairman of the Bike Walk Task Force, but these comments do not necessarily represent opinion of the Task Force.

To the Editor:

East Norwalk has almost nothing to gain, and much to lose, from the proposed widening project for East Avenue between the railroad bridge and Myrtle Street.

1. The roadway beneath the bridge became impassable during Irene and Sandy because sea level rose up from the Mill Pond to the drains. Lowering this roadway 3 feet to accommodate trucks will make the road frequently unusable, preventing residents from leaving and emergency vehicles from entering. This safety issue alone should disqualify the entire project, especially since sea level will probably rise 3 feet more this century.

2. Increasing clearance under the bridge would bring truck traffic into the heart of East Norwalk by providing an alternate route to and from the South Norwalk mall, and a bypass for I-95 traffic. The noise and pollution will discourage walkers, make local shops less appealing, and reduce property values.

3. Northbound congestion is due to the intersection at I-95, not insufficient lanes nearer the bridge. There are already 4 lanes north of Myrtle. The proposed “improvements” – adding a fourth lane in front of the churches and gas stations, and adding a third lane under the bridge – will only cause cars to drive a little faster between red lights until they hit the congestion at the overpass.

4. Congestion could be improved by encouraging walking and biking. (In NYC, the bike rental program alone accounts for 1 million trips monthly. Without bikes, there would be millions of additional car and subway trips each month.) However, the proposed work for East Avenue will not encourage biking or walking.

5. Wider roadways, wider lanes and higher speeds all increase the risk of pedestrian fatalities. This project would do all of the above. The proposed new rail bridge would allow train riders to walk over East Ave. But the street level crossing would be widened from 38 to 58 feet, which would endanger pedestrians and discourage walking to East Ave. shops.

6. The road work would not enable new bike lanes. Eminent domain issues will likely prevent widening north of Myrtle Street; sharrows are the only option. South of Myrtle, the present 40-foot roadway could already have 5-foot bike lanes if the three lanes were repainted to 10 feet (the lanes north of Myrtle are already 10 feet). Under the bridge, there is already room for two 10-foot lanes and 5-foot bike lanes – which would also create a very safe 20-foot pedestrian crossing. Adding bike lanes to reduce car traffic and improve pedestrian safety requires a few thousand (dollars) for paint, not millions for construction.

7. The problem of stuck trucks could easily be prevented by hanging warning chains from a bar ahead of the bridge. This simple solution was suggested years ago – was it avoided in hopes that stuck trucks would aggravate the public to support an otherwise irrational boondoggle?

Peter Libre

4 comments

Norwalk Parent January 9, 2016 at 8:27 am

Inter sting point regarding the flooding. Also how tall is the train bridge at Ft Point street? I think that is tall enough for trucks already so why another one? Lastly it seems the trucks going south on 95 and then get off the Westport exit take the back roads into Norwalk because the bridge will be lower than now of axis to get back on 95

Tony P January 9, 2016 at 10:22 am

The roadway needs to be widened. I lived on Cottage Street and got married at St. Thomas – it took 20 minutes for the limo to get from Cottage Street to St. Thomas on a Saturday in July – but it could have easily been 4:00 on a Thursday in February, b/c that entire stretch is insane. I wasnt biking to the church, it wasn’t raining or flooding, I wasn’t in an 18 wheeler, and we weren’t speeding anywhere. Honestly, it’s amazing that people who don’t even live in the neighborhood would suggest such ridiculous things. What the work would do is increase traffic flow, reduce congestion, and make the neighborhood easier to access. For once, I’m grateful to the state of CT for something – making this project happen.

Karl January 9, 2016 at 11:41 am

In the morning or rush hour it takes 20 minutes to get from Penny’s to 95 !!! It’s the gateway to the beach and Vet’s park. Truck traffic , going where ????? We need a sidewalk under the bridge also. As for bike lanes , they have already destroyed the daily lives of the people that live on Strawberry Hill for the 3 people that use them.

McKeen Shanogg January 9, 2016 at 9:24 pm

It seems some folks want East Norwalk to be some kind of quaint little seaside village. We are a city of 85,000 people. Face it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>