Palace Purge II

Send signed letters to [email protected]

My previous column, intimating that Stephen Bannon was not fired but purged by representatives of the Military-Industrial Complex — or more accurately, by the White House Chief of Staff, General John Kelly, in an attempt to shield America’s Corporate State — seems to have rankled a number of readers.  But what President Eisenhower warned about some 56 years ago is real and its power is monolithic.  The roster of developments since early August are striking:

  • Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, put forth the suggestion of completely privatizing the military effort in troubled Afghanistan, with regards to both ground and air contingents.  The majority of the White House staff is reputed to be opposed to such an approach.  However General James Mattis, who seems to be the emerging leader of the developing military junta of Mattis, McMaster and Kelly, confirmed, as of Sept. 22, that Prince’s offer is still open for further discussion.  Again, this aptly demonstrates the ominous and reprehensible state of affairs in which this nation finds itself, the further evisceration of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.  And there is more. . .
  • . . . in mid-August, the National Security Adviser, Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster, opposed Trump’s saber rattling concerning the potential of military action in Venezuela.  When on ABC News and asked about the possibility of such a military solution, General McMaster replied, “No I don’t.”  Breitbart News, though, besmirched General McMaster, to which a counter stroke appeared in of all places, the Jerusalem Post.  Two former Israeli military officials, Eran Lerman and Yaakov Amidor, wrote, “Such an attack is not mere opinion; it is an offensive against the truth; against basic decency and against the best interests of Israel as we see them.  In the opinion of many in the professional Israeli defense establishment who have come to know General McMaster over the years, directly and indirectly, the general is a friend.”  It should be construed as significant that the Israeli defense establishment would support the U.S. defense establishment in the face of criticism from an ultra-nationalist sounding board, since the Military-Industrial Complex bestows millions in aid to Israel every year.


The direction the Nation seems to heading can also be seen at the State Department.  According to the Washington Post, the Mission Statement of the arm of American diplomacy is to be changed.  Currently it reads, “Create a more secure, democratic and prosperous world for the benefit of the American people and the international community.”  The new draft, as quoted by the Post, “Lead America’s foreign policy through global advocacy, action, and assistance to shape a safer and more prosperous world.”  The new Mission Statement merely offers a more realistic assessment of what America truly is . . . an Empire, Pax Americana, to which the term “Democratic” is a word devoid of meaning; in addition to the elimination of referencing the “American people and the international community,” to which American foreign policy is working, for the most part, for the benefit of neither.


The United States has been exercising an arrogant, self-indulgent foreign policy for decades.  All one need do is to recall George Kennan, who urged in 1948, “The U.S. has about 50% of the world’s wealth but only 6.3% of its population. … In this situation we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment.  Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security.  To do so we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and daydreaming, and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives.  We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford the luxury of altruism and world benefaction.  … We should cease to talk about such vague and unreal objectives as human rights, the raising of living standards and democratization.  The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts.  The less we are hampered by idealistic slogans, the better. . . “


Sixty-nine years ago, then, George Kennan penned the actual Mission Statement of American foreign policy; on the heels of which President Truman would send American troops into Korea without a declaration of war, leading to our Constitution — that hallowed blueprint for government that our “elected” officials are sworn to protect — to be subjected to an insidious and protracted disembowelment, to the extent that we no longer have a functioning system of representative government.  For decades this wanton lack of regard for convention, such as declarations of war and peace treaties . . . has simplified the jump into war; a discard of convention that has cost Americans dearly, enhancing the ability of the few to control the many; the result of the void left by the demise of a functioning system of representative government.  Or as George Washington warned in his farewell address . . .


. . . (O)vergrown military establishments, which under any form of government are inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to Republican Liberty:  In this sense it is, that your Union ought to be considered as a main prop of your liberty, and that the love of the one ought to endear to you the preservation of the other.


Such is not the case today.  For the current occupant of the Oval Office is nowhere close to being that statesman America requires as Chief Executive to skillfully function in our system of checks and balances so carefully crafted by our Founders.  Quite the contrary; for the American electorate has saddled itself with a politically unskilled, unprincipled, superficial boor; a vulgar, pompous knave who could not be adversely impacting this majestic nation any more than if he was a paid enemy agent.  And when it requires elements of the military to bring some sort of order to that exercise in buffoonery that is the Trump Administration, the veil has certainly been raised, shedding light on that fiction of that Shining City on the Hill as put forth by Reagan; when in actuality it is a tarnished political slum, a ghettoized remnant of our pilfered Republic, consigned for the service of the politically unwashed.

Mark Albertson



Michael McGuire October 1, 2017 at 9:32 am

Interesting take on things. Ironic since the US has been steadily pulling back from its role as world cop since the fall of the Berlin wall. More so that the American people voted in the current occupant of the White House to clean up the mess here at home.

In 1944 the US, as one of the two last economies standing, created a worldwide level playing field via the Brenton Woods Agreement. This allowed for a safe and orderly rebuilding of the world’s economies via free trade and any nation could participate but with one stipulation – the US called the shots one dealing with communism. In essence, the imperialistic nature of nations was put on hold. This was not, and never was intended to be a Pax Americana. It was the bulwark against communism – that “war” was won. So what to do?

Since Bush 1 each president has grappled with this issue (what to do?) but with no clear direction other than keeping the peace ensuring the free flow of energy (oil) to the US. But a curious thing happened over the past decade – the US become energy independent due to huge advances in fracking technologies. This is why oil is now at $50 a barrel and likely to stay that way for next 20+ years for the US at least. We are awash in energy created by hundreds of small companies that are not controlled by the big oil interests.

The result – for the first time since Brenton Woods we don’t need to be the world cop. We can just let the world be, and focus on cleaning up our own $20 trillion mess.

Throw in a leader not bought by the powers that be, one that understands it’s time to focus on our issues at home (income inequality, re- building America infrastructure, tax reform, giving power back to the people, etc.), and is it any wonder that the establishment (left and right), is having a meltdown.

Will this be messy? Absolutely. Worldwide the imperialistic nature of history is taking hold again. And here at home the opening salvos of the “establishment war” have been fired as demonstrated by the congressional inaction, media’s apoplectic screeching, and the college campus snow flake syndrome.

But one thing has always been true – never bet against the American people.

Donna Smirniotopoulos October 1, 2017 at 12:24 pm

Poor George Kennan must be doing backflips in his grave right now. Kennan, author of the famous Long Telegram, that clocked in at a whopping 5000 words (By some accounts 8000), also wrote the Top Secret 1948 memorandum to the US Foreign Policy Planning Staff PPS23, quoted briefly—very briefly, becasue like our author, Kennan never met a word he didn’t like—above and completely out of context, though thanks to sites like “Word Press” mere mortals can cherry pick juicy tidbits to feed whatever hobby horse they’re riding at the moment.

Kennan was a realist, and this foreign policy memo, declassified in 1974, reflects that realism. Kennan writes extensively and expansively about containment of soviet influence in Western Europe. He writes about Palestine. And he writes about the Far East, from which the quote above is lifted. Though Kennan came to regret some of the elements of the containment policy, one of his greater regrets was the influence of memo PPS23 on the formation of the CIA’s clandestine service—or what Kennan called “political warfare”.

Since the foreign policy memo was top secret for decades, I’m not sure how the brief contents quoted above could have come close to articulating a foreign policy mission statement. Importantly, though Kennan nominally support our efforts in Korea, he was at best ambivalent, and he did not support further intervention in Southeast Asia.

Maria Alarcon October 1, 2017 at 1:34 pm

Stop buying into the propaganda about Bannon and Gorka.
They both left of their own accord in order to help Trump from the outside, because they were being too restricted by the deep state. And if you read anything other than the mainstream propaganda out there, you will see that they have been doing just that.
It was the best thing for Trump. It is helping him a lot, as you can see with the recent winning of Moore over Strange in the primary to run for Sessions’ senate seat.
Always listen to what the actual people in question have to say, never ever rely on msm. Bannon and Gorka have given many interviews and statements about why they left. Find them. Read them. Watch them. Don’t be lazy. That’s what the left counts on, so they can lie to you.

Just another Norwalk Voter October 1, 2017 at 7:40 pm

This comment has been judged to be insulting to the writer, a violation of the comments policy.

Notaffilated October 1, 2017 at 11:40 pm

I was lost after the hundredth paragraph. Can’t we talk about local issues? Whatever became of the guy who posted anti-Muslim flyers in SoNo?

As with other similar situations, my gut tells me it won’t be some crazed Trump supporter — more apt to be someone “we’d leadt expect”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>