Quantcast

Norwalk needs to ban fracking waste

(Norwalk River Watershed Association)

Send signed letters to [email protected]

Editor’s note: The Ordinance Committee is considering this issue today, Tuesday, Feb. 20.

To the editor:

My name is Louise Washer and I am president of the Norwalk River Watershed Association. I am working with volunteers in the six watershed towns to help pass ordinances to ban fracking waste.  

 

Connecticut has a temporary moratorium on some types of fracking waste, however, as part of that same law, the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) must submit draft regulations by July 1 for importing this waste. Future regulations = future permits. The local ordinances that 36 Connecticut towns have passed so far, most recently Redding, protect towns permanently from a comprehensive list of wastes from drilling and extraction processes. Weston and Ridgefield are considering bans now, and in Norwalk there is a presentation on the issue at the Ordinance Committee meeting at 7 p.m. tomorrow, Feb. 20, at City Hall.  It is important for people to show up who care about protecting water quality and the Sound from possible spills during transport, treatment, storage and from secondary uses (as a de-icer on roads, an additive to construction fill and cement…).

 

The state has failed to pass a permanent ban three times in the last five years, but the bill, Senate Bill 103, is being reintroduced this session. We need citizens to please submit testimony for Senate Bill 103 “An Act Concerning Hydraulic Fracturing Waste in CT” to the Environment Committee by 3 p.m. on Thursday, February 22nd. Please send an attached pdf file to:  [email protected] .  Also, if possible, help fill the room at the Public Hearing on Friday February 23rd, 11 a.m. in Room 1A at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford. We need Republican co-Chair Senator Miner’s vote for this to move on and be called by the Senate.

 

Pennsylvania produces hundreds of thousands of tons of this toxic, radioactive waste every year. It would potentially come to Norwalk via I-84, Route 7 and I-95 to Bridgeport which houses a hazardous waste treatment facility. (The two other such facilities in the state are in Bristol and Meriden, both of which have passed bans.)

 

Fewer than 25 miles from Norwalk, Westchester County passed a permanent fracking waste ban in 2012, signed into law by the Republican County Executive. Republican-dominated Putnam County followed the next year. Across the Sound, Nassau and Suffolk Counties, passed waste bans years ago, and have gone back to amend and strengthen them since. All five boroughs of New York City banned fracking waste in 2016. The State of Vermont and many parts of New Jersey also have bans in place. Connecticut is just waking up to the problem. This week Redding was the 36th town to pass a ban, and we at the Norwalk River Watershed Association hope Norwalk will follow.

 

More information is available on our website: http://norwalkriver.org/help-ban-fracking-waste/

 

Sincerely,

Louise Washer

Norwalk River Watershed Association

7 comments

steve February 19, 2018 at 5:17 pm

I don’t want fracking waste- but how could it be “radioactive”? I generally am not in favor of getting other people’s waste brought to our town but this isn’t plutonium or uranium. Why would fracking waste be any different than any other geological waste? My understanding is that the process can give rise to environmentally hazardous substances but I’m no expert

Laura L February 20, 2018 at 9:13 am

The date of the Norwalk Ordinance Committee meeting needs clarification, please. Today is February 20th and the presentation meeting is TONIGHT, not tomorrow. Tonight – Tuesday night – at 7pm at Norwalk City Hall.

Diane Lauricella February 20, 2018 at 9:38 am

Correct. Tonight at 7 pm. If you cannot make it, please email the Mayor and your Council to offer your support.

Adolph Neaderland February 20, 2018 at 11:30 am

Any waste treatment that leads to local contamination, especially the waters of Long Island Sound should be prohibited.

It is my understanding that there is also the possibility that toxic liquid from treatment of the frackng process may be dumped into the Sound.

Ban by law!

Adolph Neaderland

marny Smith February 21, 2018 at 11:47 am

The Ordinance Committee meeting last night (2/20) was overflowing, S.R.O., and many well-informed people were there to enlighten those less well-informed. It seems so logical to ban toxic fracking waste from coming into CT; but as we build infrastructure to accept natural gas derived from fracking it seems equally logical that the oil and gas companies doing the fracking would seek to sell (dump) their toxic by-product in the states that benefit from the abundant electricity they are providing us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>