Quantcast

Legislators eye changes to state education aid

State Rep. Robert Sanchez, new co-chair of the education committee. (Contributed)

The leadership of the legislature’s Education Committee will be almost completely new this session, but many of the committee’s perennial issues — education funding and the state’s achievement gap — are likely to continue to be center stage.

Rep. Robert Sanchez, D-New Britain, a new co-chairman of the committee, said he believes that the state’s Education Cost Sharing formula — used to distribute the state’s main education grant — needs to be tweaked or possibly reworked.

He said that many school systems are still getting the same amount of money they got years ago.

“If we tweak the formula it may be that some towns will get less, but that makes sense if you are down 50 children,” Sanchez said. “There’s a lot to look into. We have to sit down with the unions, the local boards of education. I want everyone at the table.”

But Senate Minority leader and Education Committee member Len Fasano of North Haven said that the latest iteration of the cost sharing formula was achieved through a bi-partisan effort and that it should be maintained.

“It took into account all of the factors that are important: the Grand List, poverty, [English Language Learners] ….” Fasano said, mentioning several other factors. “This went through many eyes: Republicans, Democrats, the administration… Any talk about changing the formula disturbs me. In fairness, we came up with the answer.”

The fact that the legislature tilted Democratic in the recent election, Fasano said, shouldn’t be reason to change a formula that was achieved through a “fair, transparent and honest process.”

The new Senate ranking member of the education committee, Sen. Eric Berthel, R-Watertown, was out of town and couldn’t be reached.

Sen. Doug McCrory, D-Hartford,  the new vice-chairman of the committee, didn’t mince words on the funding formula.

“Personally, I think we need to start all over and scrap ECS,” he said. “There’s nothing wrong with starting over. What we have done hasn’t worked for awhile.”

McCrory said another priority for him is reducing the “opportunity gap” for students who are not achieving at acceptable levels, as well as raising the achievement levels of students who are already doing well.

National tests have shown that Connecticut’s achievement gap between socio-economic and racial groups has narrowed a bit for certain grades and subject areas and widened for others, but still remains one of the largest in the country.

Another key issue for education legislators is charter schools, which are public schools that are publicly-funded and privately managed. Sanchez said he hasn’t been “a real big supporter of charter schools,” but he has been willing to compromise.

“My biggest feeling is we really need to work on the [neighborhood] public school system and fix whatever we can there before we start concentrating on opening up new charter schools,” Sanchez said.

Fasano said he is concerned about the way charter schools are funded. “Right now they are a line item, susceptible to be taken out of the budget in any given year,” Fasano said, leaving charter operators “on pins and needles.”

He said legislators need to consider whether to include funding for charters in the Education Cost Sharing grant.

Rep. Kathleen McCarty (CTMirror)

Rep. Kathleen McCarty, R-Waterford, the new House ranking member, said she is interested in working on a bill that might encourage districts to pursue social-emotional learning programs for students.  A bill on social-emotional learning made it through the house last year but stalled in the Senate, she said.

McCarty also expects that a school safety bill passed by the legislature last year but later vetoed by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy will probably return, perhaps in modified way.

Sanchez, who worked with pre-school children for 20 years, said another key issue for him is obtaining fair salaries for pre-school teachers.

“They are the lowest paid teachers,” he said, adding that teachers have been told to get their associate’s and bachelor’s degrees, but still aren’t making much money.

Sanchez said he’d also like to see funding for more paraprofessionals to assist special education teachers.

Those no longer on the education committee include longtime education co-chairman Rep. Andy Fleischmann, D-West Hartford, who lost his bid for re-election in a primary; Sen. Gayle Slossberg, D-Milford, a former education co-chairwoman who declined to run again this year; and veteran Sen. Toni Boucher R- Wilton, who was also a co-chairwoman of the education committee and was defeated in November.

Sanchez was vice-chairman of the Education Committee last year.

Sen. Beth Bye, D-West Hartford, was named co-chairwoman of education but then was tapped by Gov.-elect Ned Lamont to lead the Office for Early Childhood.

4 comments

Bryan Meek January 5, 2019 at 11:58 am

Sounds like we should prepare ourselves for another big screw job from the state. Hartford is getting $203 million next year for education. A $3 million increase. Norwalk got an additional $380,000, a bit above $11 million, but with cuts to other areas to wash it away. And the representative from Hartford here doesn’t think its enough.

Piberman January 5, 2019 at 3:46 pm

CT’s educational policies haven’t changed in decades Here’s the basic principles. In a State with a good dozen nationally prominent private colleges and universities we spend over a billion on UCONN that needs import 25% out of State students to keep its well paid public Union faculty employed. Second, we seriously underfund public education where its most needed – in our major depressed cities. Third, we give State Aid to virtually all towns even when they are among the wealthiest in the nation. Fourth, we dramatically under fund teacher pensions provided by the State. Fifth, some towns and cities perennially claim that their budget problems would just about disappear with getting their “fair share” of State educational funding.

So here’s a suggestion. Lets encourage our local Legisaltors “standing up for us” to visit Bridgeport Schools and then explain why Norwalk needs much more State Aid to balance its budget. Ignoring that Norwalk residents have per capita incomes modestly above t he CT average and Bridgeport well below the national average.

CT claims to be a “Great State”. Despite the pronounced Exodus. But the parents and kids attending public school in Bridgeport have a different perception. So the real question is whether any Legisaltor really cares about providing basic public education to our neediest citizens. Or is it just about getting more State funding for Norwalk so its teachers can continue to be paid on a par with those of our surrounding wealthy towns.

Norwalk Lost January 5, 2019 at 3:51 pm

It is fascinating how the leftists in Hartford get to decide how to redistribute Fairfield County’s tax revenue to the largest welfare cities in the state. Free healthcare, food stamps, housing and college tuition . . .and just wait till the new crop of socialists take over and initiate universal basic income. At what point do legal challenges come to mind to halt this nonsense?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>