Quantcast

Norwalk Council sends noise ordinance ahead for a vote

Tracey Dinkin speaks to the Norwalk Common Council Ordinance Committee, Tuesday in City Hall. People use a traffic light near her for “fantasy,” revving their engines and then peeling out when it turns green, she said.

NORWALK, Conn. – After two years of effort, Norwalk Common Council members finalized a new noise ordinance and moved it forward for approval.

Ordinance committee members unanimously approved new rules that would prohibit what Council President Tom Livingston (D-District E) called “real noisy construction stuff” on weekends, move back the allowed construction start time from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m, and set special maximum noise levels for the Washington Street area, where residents live in close proximity to bars.

“I have lived here for 26 years now and the noise has been a problem almost all that time… I am very glad you are doing this, I hope it all works,” Mary “Ann” Frimmett said to the Ordinance Committee at its Tuesday meeting, after the vote.

If the full Council greenlights the overhaul at its next meeting, probably in May, the admittedly “not perfect” ordinance will be sent to the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) for final approval.

Several residents pleaded, at the meeting’s start, for relief from noise.

Tracey Dinkin objected to “constant” noise in the Fodor Farm area, where she lives.

“It doesn’t stop and that can drive you crazy,” she said. “It interferes with your life, it interferes with your ability to … have some peace and quiet in your own home to do your regular activities. It goes on all night and after the leaf blowers stops and the lawn mowing stops and the tree chipping stops, then we have the traffic all night long; we can’t help traffic but some of it is at a ridiculous level of noise.”

John Ryan, Dinkin’s husband, decried noise from endless landscaping.

“I could deal with this if it was every once in a while but we live in an area where it’s 1/8th acre zoning and it’s hundreds of homes,” Ryan said.  He’s concerned about landscaping work that makes “an incredible amount of noise for 14 hours a day… We don’t know how much longer we can stay in Norwalk if this is what we have to deal with.”

“No one should be allowed to buy a home and then find out later it’s not conducive to living,” said Vernon Howard, a SoNo resident. One of his neighbors said he’d rented a SoNo apartment sight unseen due to a job relocation, and felt the landlord had deceived him.

“I am moving from Norwalk, out of state again with my job, because I feel apathy and ignorance from bar owners,” he said.

Two Rowayton residents complained about “intolerable” noise from a year-and-a-half of work to remove ledge for a construction project on Meeker Court.

“I could shout at the top of my lungs and not hear myself,” Dana Laird said.  “The icing on the cake” was a pneumatic tool and an excavator pounding rock 50 feet from her head, which woke her up at 7 a.m. on Labor Day, she said.

“It sounds like a jackhammer on steroids,” Lynn Stephens Massey said.

Diane Lauricella, representing South Norwalk Citizens for Justice, said she’s heard complaints of dumpsters emptied at 2 a.m.  The longtime activist called for inclusion of recycling trucks in the ordinance’s language because, she said,  the term “solid waste” doesn’t cover them.  Lauricella also requested an emergency meeting with Norwalk Police who she alleged don’t have the right attitude when investigating noise complaints.

After public comment ended, Council members tweaked the ordinance.

Livingston led the tweaking, with a lot of input from Colin Hosten (D-At Large), who noted the availability of  quieter leaf blowers.  Doug Hempstead (R-District D) questioned the efficacy of allowing residents but not contractors to work on their lawns on weekends, noting that residents can also buy loud equipment.

Livingston said he’d worked with Assistant Corporation Counsel Brian Candela to define construction work as jack hammering, pavement breaking, pile driving and removal of matter. The “real noisy construction stuff” would be prohibited on weekends and holidays, and would only be allowed between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., he said.

He agreed with Massey about the noise from Meeker Court, which both said could be heard at Bayley Beach.

“It is unbearable,” he said. “There is no excuse for it, it shouldn’t be allowed to happen and I think we understand that construction has to go on in the city but I think that there’s a balance of health and safety issues with the need for construction.”

Emergencies would be exempted, Council members said.

“I am concerned about stifling the city’s growth. All development is going to be more costly,” Michael Corsello (D-At Large) said.

“The question ultimately asks, what is the price tag that we place on people’s health?” Hosten asked.

“I recognize the problem, the solutions just are very complicated,” Corsello said.

Hosten, Livingston and Hempstead all noted that construction of The SoNo Collection mall on West Avenue is happening outside of the hours allowed by the present ordinance.

Concerns about residential areas abutting light industrial zones need to be dealt with later, they said.  Council member Darlene Young (D-District B) who is not a member of the committee, disagreed.

“The folks in South Norwalk have been dealing with this issue for quite a long time and I think it’s a good thing that the council is at this point of really addressing the issue,” she said. “So I think it should just be in there somehow.”

Hempstead said the ordinance could be tweaked while the state DEEP completes its required review.

“We don’t know how long it will take, that’s why we need something to get it going,” Committee Chairwoman Eloisa Melendez (D-District A) said.

Corsello objected to Melendez’s suggestion that leaf blowers be banned on Sunday.

“Why are we excluding one activity?” Livingston asked.

Leaf blowers are banned in Rye, N.Y., Massey said from the audience. Melendez had said they’re banned in Greenwich.

Corsello objected that lawnmowers wouldn’t qualify under the noise limits.  “You want to be drastic, tell people they can’t mow their lawns anymore,” he said. “That becomes blight.”

The ordinance is “not perfect but it’s an improvement and it’s a way to move it forward,” Hosten said later, echoing a common sentiment.

Further tweaks included gender-neutral language and the substitution of “noise control administrator” in place of “police chief.”  The term “civil penalties” was switched to “fines” during a discussion of enforcement.

Afterwards, Lauricella thanked the Council members for the “thoughtful” discussion.  Dinkins said she appreciated the work, and asked when she can complain again.

Next week’s Council meeting is likely to be cancelled, so the next opportunity would be May 7, Livingston said.

SoNo bar owners complained during multiple prior discussions that the proposed ordinance would hurt their businesses and could even force some to close.

Emmy Sasaki of F.D. Rich, developer of The SoNo Pearl and the hotel soon to open on South Main Street, called that “complete nonsense.”

“They don’t have to close, they just have to be good neighbors, abide by new laws and play by the rules like everyone else,” she said. “… They need to be responsible and accountable rather than selfish and careless, which has been the case for far too long. The allowable decibels are widely accepted and used all over the country. They are not going to put anyone out of business but give law enforcement the tools that they need to control the problem.”

10 comments

Mitch Adis April 17, 2019 at 6:46 am

Speaking of tools – Do the Police have calibrated noise measuring equipment with them to enforce this ordinance?

Steve Mann April 17, 2019 at 6:55 am

Ratepayers of Norwalk have long wondered whether or not city officials had any respect for quality of life issues. We now have an answer from at least one CC member.

“I am concerned about stifling the city’s growth. All development is going to be more costly,” Michael Corsello (D-At Large) said.

Alice Allen April 17, 2019 at 9:31 am

Give me a break. Police Chief changed to noise control
administrator. Since that position has more to be responsible for than noise I think Law Enforcement
Administrator would be more appropriate.

Bryan Meek April 17, 2019 at 10:07 am

When I think of quiet bucolic neighborhoods, Washington Street is the first place that comes to mind. And living on top of a nightclub thats been there for 20 years is also a prerequisite.

John Levin April 17, 2019 at 11:16 am

“Do the Police have calibrated noise measuring equipment with them to enforce this ordinance?” – excellent question, Mitch. There is a free app called ‘Soundprint’ which is a great smartphone tool for exactly that purpose and of course it can be used by anyone. The app was designed to allow croudsourcing of information about restaurant noise levels, but obviously has broader uses. It works quite well, plus: free.

Steve Mann April 18, 2019 at 8:41 am

Rem, you’ve presented what appears to be a false equivalence. These two situations may appear to be the same because the common factor is noise, but while you’re free to leave, or not even enter a noisy restaurant, you are helpless to control some noise factors effecting your quaility of life at home.

Audrey Cozzarin April 18, 2019 at 11:54 am

I had reached out to several Common Council members about recent extremely loud construction noise just outside my neighborhood, when I was unable to escape the noise in my own home–am glad to know that we’re starting to really consider “quality of life” issues such as this in Norwalk.

I read this poem at the Jazz & Poetry reading at the Norwalk Inn 2 weeks ago, and I share with you all:

“A Prayer for the People of Fairfield County”
May all people find quiet
to hear birdsong in surburbia

May all people drive a bit slower
to appreciate the beauty around us

May all people have respect for
and patience with other people

May all people find wisdom in nature
providing sanctuary for wildlife

May all people make choices
for the betterment of all

Adolph Neaderland April 18, 2019 at 12:41 pm

Norwalk’s building code should include noise (sound) isolation specs for residential units above or adjacent to commercial space.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>