Quantcast

Letter to the Editor: Learning from Closures — How Norwalk Can Build a Smarter, Stronger Future

As a Norwalk resident and business owner, I’ve watched our city evolve with pride, curiosity, and, at times, concern. Growth is essential, but smart growth is what truly sustains a community. The recent, unexpected closure of Yard House at the SoNo Collection has left many of us asking: What’s really going on here?  

Yard House, a well-known national chain, was highly anticipated when it opened. In a city with a strong commuter population and growing downtown traffic, a restaurant like Yard House should have had the ingredients for long-term success. Chains of this caliber are typically backed by deep resources, strong brand recognition, and data-driven site selection, making their closure especially noteworthy. With a population of just over 90,000, Norwalk may simply not be large enough to sustainably support the growing number of big-box restaurants and national chains being introduced. Its sudden departure after just four years—and without any public explanation—raises serious questions not just about that particular space, but about the broader trajectory of Norwalk’s development. It’s also worth noting that many employees of large chains like Yard House often can’t afford to live in Norwalk, highlighting an ongoing disconnect between the jobs being created and the cost of living in our city. This mismatch between economic opportunity and affordability suggests a development model that favors short-term gains over long-term resilience.  

Smart growth is about more than buildings and brand names. It’s about thoughtfully planned development that meets the long-term needs of residents and businesses, without sacrificing affordability, accessibility,  or community identity. It requires balancing innovation with preservation, and corporate investment with local entrepreneurship. Smart growth is in tune with the people who live here—not just designed to attract those passing through.  

The SoNo Collection, which opened in 2019, was one of the last traditional enclosed malls to be built in the United States, marking the end of an era in retail development. While it has brought energy and visitors to the area, we must ask: has it contributed to Norwalk’s fabric, or is it simply sitting on top of it? If a national chain like Yard House can’t make it there, what does that mean for the future of Jacob’s Pickles? And what about Sally’s Apizza, which remains unopened after years of anticipation?  

Unfortunately, this pattern is becoming familiar. The opening of Elm Street Diner was repeatedly delayed.  The same has happened with businesses on Washington Street and in the Waypointe development.  Delays, closures, high turnover. Is it high rent? Lack of foot traffic? Inadequate parking? Oversaturation?  Or is there a deeper disconnect between what’s being built and what Norwalk actually needs?  

If the current model can’t support a mix of national and local establishments, how can we expect small businesses—those without the cushion of corporate backing—to survive?  

Our local businesses need more than ribbon cuttings and social media shoutouts. They need infrastructure, a predictable permitting process, affordable rents, and—above all—community support.  They need leadership that values not just newness, but sustainability.  

Smart growth listens. It asks: What do Norwalk residents want? What do we need more of? What are we missing? How can we better align development with our city’s unique character and potential? If we build it—will they really come?  

The closing of Yard House shouldn’t be dismissed as a blip. It should be a wake-up call. Let’s use it to examine our path forward and ensure that Norwalk is not just growing, but growing wisely, inclusively, and sustainably.  

Vinny Scicchitano  

2025 Mayoral Candidate 

Editor’s Note: This letter has been lightly edited for grammar. It has not been fact-checked and reflects the views of the author.

Comments

15 responses to “Letter to the Editor: Learning from Closures — How Norwalk Can Build a Smarter, Stronger Future”

  1. David Muccigrosso

    The mall should never have been built. It destroyed a perfectly workable — and WALKABLE — street grid!

    The sickness goes much deeper than any one business closure or street. This political machine is too addicted to its own power to micromanage businesses and let big developers run roughshod over everything. This is the same machine that paved over large chunks of West/Main with parking lots when we had a perfectly good mid-density stretch. They are not competent to run a city, and should not be trusted.

    If you ask me, the charter rewrite should strip all excess zoning power from the city and commit to single-day turnaround times for all permitting.

  2. Mike Mushak

    This tone-deaf letter is so full of contradictions and omissions it’s hard to know where to start.

    First, a Trump-loving MAGA mayoral candidate like Vinny has no standing to lecture anyone about “smart growth”, as his morally corrupt hero Trump systematically destroys our economy risking all of our futures. Never has our country taken such an abrupt reversal of its economy based on one man’s misguided and self-serving decisions.

    It also seems Vinny has no clue that full-service restaurants like the Yard House are directly affected by consumer sentiment, which has plummeted since Trump has taken office. Economic growth forecasts have all declined since Trump and his Republican enablers have taken over the government. When we are led by the intentional fear and chaos of the morally and ethically-corrupt self-serving Republican Party, the winners are the billionaires at the top and the losers are the rest of the country. Sadly, the Yard House may be a harbinger of things to come, thanks to Republicans like Vinny who support the corrupt felon in the White House.

    Second, it is an astounding omission to ignore the 3,000 jobs and livelihoods the SONO Collection has brought to Norwalk, as well as the millions in state and local taxes it generates.

    Third, to hear Vinny complain about housing affordability while actively opposing the building of new housing, is the height of hypocrisy. He seems truly clueless about the housing crisis our state and region is facing, and how the principle of supply and demand works. Vinny’s policies would drive housing costs even higher than they are now, driving out the middle and working class faster than you can say “This is the Republican Gentrification Plan to Make Norwalk a City of the Wealthy Only”.

    The truth is Norwalk is already building smartly, increasing housing opportunities and density in walkable neighborhoods near transit where most younger and older folks want to live nowadays, and we are growing at a 6% per decade growth rate that is far below the 20-40% per decade growth rates of the last century when suburban sprawl destroyed our once-abundant farms and open space. We are now correcting those 20th-century car-oriented planning mistakes, as every smart city is doing across the nation. And our current vacancy rate of 5.2% is at the very beginning of the ideal 5-10% vacancy rate when housing costs stabilize and even decline as completion increases, which will help anyone looking for a more affordable place to live. This is the WRONG time to slow housing growth just on the cusp of this positive development in our expensive housing market.

    Vinny is no doubt an excellent auto mechanic, but he repeatedly demonstrates how clueless he is on a lot of basic important subjects about running a complex growing city, such as housing trends and affordability, economic growth, and what our vibrant business community needs to thrive. He even attacked two prominent Norwalk-based developers recently, long-time members of our Chamber of Commerce, for investing their time and resources in improving our great city. This is not what mayors are supposed to do, attacking local businesses to score a few cheap political points. Shameful, actually. Vinny is obviously failing the basic driver test of what it means to be a mayor of “all the people”.

    Vinny’s backwards policies will be no way to run a city, but then again, we just need to look to Vinny’s hero Trump to see how Republicans in general these days are completely out of touch with reality. Bottom line, Norwalk’s beautiful diverse population does not want or need a reactionary MAGA auto-mechanic as mayor with zero experience in government, not even a stint on any city board or commission to learn how the city actually works.

    I doubt Vinny would hire a mechanic for his business with zero training or experience, so why does he think we should elect him as the most under-qualified mayor in Norwalk’s history? No thanks!

    1. David Muccigrosso

      Mike, Vinny can be wrong on basically every point, but that mall still should not have been built.

      Classic street grids with mixed-use residential are what create prosperity. It’s what works on Washington Street, and what works in literally every city in the world. We HAD a street grid on that site at one point, and it got progressively denuded over the decades to put up parking lots and speed up traffic on West Ave, making it hostile to pedestrians… all for the site to eventually get paved over to put the mall there. It’s a mall scaled for cars, and built too big for the actual car traffic that comes its way. Some genius also decided that the restaurants shouldn’t have access from inside the mall! Who wants to walk alongside a bunch of cars flying by at 30-40mph along West Ave like that, just to get to a meal?

      The whole area is a mess. It’s not necessarily YOUR mess, but it’s a mess decades in the making.

      Our future planning efforts should focus on sustainable growth by encouraging foot traffic and infill. The only way to rescue that mall at this point is to build up the neighborhood around it so that the mall will slowly fade into the fabric of a well-connected, highly navigable, and highly affordable neighborhood. That starts with legalizing and incentivizing more construction of the kinds of buildings on Washington Street, less of the big apartment towers — Washington-style buildings can house PLENTY of people without those monstrous, wasteful lobbies — and penalizing blighted properties while facilitating poorly-matched businesses to relocate, so that the neighborhood isn’t punctuated by ugly empty parking lots and weed-covered buildings like so many missing teeth in an ugly smile.

  3. Drew Todd

    And this is why we need someone like Vinny leading our City!!!! We don’t need more career politicians we have way too many of those already. Vinny has been a mainstay in our community and is a proven leader. He is EXACTLY what this City needs!

  4. Tysen Canevari

    Really Mushake? You are like Bob Duff. You worry about Trump all day. What does one have to do with the other? Did Harry idolize Joe Biden? Just to be clear, Trump did win the election. So that means you are in the minority. Vinny is a solid individual who cares about Norwalk and knows how to run a business. Harry has always had the luxury of using our checkbook. The dems have said we need all these apartments and yet Merrit 7 is half empty, the mall struggles, and Washington ST always has empty store fronts. 22 percent of the people that live here work here! Thats a terrible figure. That means people just sleep here. 75 percent of our tax base is residential now. Each year for the next three years our taxes will go up 10 percent! Hardly good management. Hows that Tyvek temple coming along? We paid 1.4 million for a parcel of land that the city assesor valued at $400,000 next to Lockwood mansion. You are clearly one sided so instead of saying Vinny is no good just say you only like Democrats. That would be much easier

  5. Audrey Cozzarin

    I’m glad Vinny opened a door to conversation about this important “hot” topic here in Norwalk.

    In looking at the wider picture, I think it’s sad that we have to build density in order to house scores of younger and older people near transit hubs. This whole scheme feels so contrary to nature. What have we humans done to our natural world that we even have to plan for this? I’m not sure about the stats that young professionals and “older folks” want to live in apartments near noisy transit hubs in urban environments. Most young adults I know want very much to have a house with a yard and a family but end up settling for an apartment as a last resort. Most older adults I know, like myself, want to stay in their homes. I have no desire whatsoever to live in an apartment by a transit hub. I root for the health benefits of living in a “village,” a lifestyle many people desire, being able to walk or bike to a “village” as opposed to living around noisy and dangerous traffic which here in Norwalk seems to be getting more pronounced.

    The scale of a city, its character, its natural features, help determine “smart growth” as well as urban planning. If the human future is expected to accommodate cramming people into density-style cities, I’m not a fan. There is a city we like in GA, 1/3 the population of Norwalk, which embodies smart growth with homes (houses, not apartment buildings) in town and a 30-mile off-road bike/walk trail that connects all parts of the city (including a small college and the lower-income neighborhoods) to the city center. It’s quiet, but vibrant. It has a good tree canopy. It has a new music amphitheater and a cool warehouse-style music venue. It has hip restaurants. It has 3 museums. It has a performing arts center. It’s a well-run city and perhaps we will relocate there. Norwalk has huge problems around housing that I’m not sure any mayor can resolve at this point. If the city grows and grows and grows it will reach (and perhaps has already reached) a limit. From what I have seen and experienced during the 20+ years I’ve lived here, the traffic is worse, roads are constantly under repair, trees keep coming down, and the noise is terrible. Yet, I hold out hope and volunteer in every way I can think of to help this city achieve its potential as a friendly and caring community. Any new development should be based on whether it promotes a good quality of life for all.

    Can we dream a bit, can we each give ourselves a few moments of freedom to feel and think about how we wish to live? What kind of place, what sort of city? Then, share? Can we get together and talk about our ideas and proposed solutions without the kind of bickering that appears here on NoN? We want to reach consensus, not continue to find ways to divide ourselves. Thank you to NoN, Vinny, and all those who speak up and share their views.

  6. Tysen Canevari

    I love these people who think the economy is struggling. What indicators are they looking at?, the S&P, which has had a record run lately, or Dow which has had volatility from every keyboard E*Trade day trader but is back higher than when Trump got in. Or ignore the inflation and jobs numbers which are true economic indicators. They gaslight. There is no truth, no facts, just opinions they want to be true to bring negativity.
    Oh and even left leaning CNBC posted a story last night that in the last month alone tariffs brought in 16 Billion which directly goes to offset the deficit. But failure is everywhere!! In last 4 years deficit has gone up 10 trillion. 3 ways to fix it. Raise taxes (dems scream) Decrease spending (dems vilified Doge) or put on tariffs. Evil Trump!! lol. Gas prices down, oil is down, Putin loses his one weapon, oil, when it goes below $60. His oil is low quality and already sells at a discount to Brent. He has one tool to make money, oil and nat gas and US is easily supplying Europe with LNG now. That’s why he’s willing to negotiate. He is out of money and men!!

  7. Vinny Scicchitano

    Thank you to everyone who has weighed in on this important and often heated topic in Norwalk. I believe we all share a common goal: we want Norwalk to grow responsibly and thrive.

    That’s why I was disheartened to see a recent comment misrepresenting who I am and what I stand for. The accusations made about me are simply not true. I’m not running to play political games—I’m running to serve the people of Norwalk with common sense, transparency, and respect.

    Personal insults and attacks on my background won’t distract me from the real issues: affordability, overdevelopment, and accountability. These are the challenges Norwalk faces, and that’s where our focus should be.

    I’ve built my life and my business here. I know what hard work looks like, and I know this city deserves better.

    I also believe in the power of teamwork—not just in assembling the right people for the right roles, but in recognizing when to seek guidance and collaborate with those who bring expertise I may not have. True leadership is knowing when to lead, when to listen, and when to ask for help. You may just call me an auto mechanic, but I am also a business owner who leads in many areas across Norwalk. I understand what it means to build something from the ground up, to manage people, budgets, and expectations—and to stay accountable through it all.

    Mike, I will be reaching out to you directly. You clearly care deeply about the city’s growth and vacancy trends, and I’d welcome the chance to sit down with you and go over your data.

    My door is always open. Let’s rise above personal attacks and focus on what really matters: Norwalk’s future

    1. David Muccigrosso

      Vinny, I’m no fan of Mike, but you can’t credibly claim to support affordability when you oppose development at every opportunity.

      If you were a strident supporter of something like the Strong Towns program, which originates from a traditional conservative perspective on what makes urbanism work and a classical liberal perspective on private property rights, then perhaps I could take you seriously. But you have said nary a word on the subject!

      Business owners in Norwalk need more than just words and vague pledges of support. They need to know how you’re going to change an oppressive local regulatory and zoning regime so that it doesn’t take countless months to open a freaking business. They need to know how you’re going to stop big developers from speculating on property values and help create an ecosystem of small-time guys who can build real value in Norwalk.

      Until you can give answers to those things, you’re just as unproductive and unserious as Harry and his machine.

  8. Ronald Koroscil

    Mike,

    Do you really think consumer sentiment is down because of Trump and that’s why Yard House closed? Beyond doubtful. Every restaurant I’ve been to in the last 4 months has been packed so it’s not Trump. So what is it then? I think some of the answers are in what Vinny, Tysen and others have said in this thread. Norwalk needs to be careful.

  9. John O’Neill

    I’m amused by some of the hostile tone above. I think Vinny could find a cure for cancer, and he’d be vilified by some (not all) on the Left protecting their territory.
    Nothing like a discussion where people are talking over people but not too them. Maybe it’s time to have a glass of wine and chill out.
    The rhetoric is way too strong and should be toned down. Sadly, the adults in the room will be passing this misguided approach on to the next generation.
    Personally, I like some of what Dems have done with Norwalk. However, it’s also obvious they’re not batting 1.000%.
    Other ideas may or may not be agreed on, but they’re always worth a listen. At least that’s always been my understanding.

  10. Alexa Giovannini

    I am curious to hear more about “smart development”. I think we see similar trends in turn over on Washington St which has high foot traffic and in recent years there have been incentives on rent in this area. What kind of businesses or development would enrich the city long term? Given the cities resistance to an increase in density and multi-family homes, adding affordable house is a juggling act, so I would be interested to hear your plan.

  11. Laszlo Balazs

    As a writer who has seen a lot of AI-generated content, Mr. Scicchitano’s initial piece and his subsequent comment look as if they were written with ChatGPT or another piece of generative AI. Online AI detectors think so too — I ran the article through various detectors that detected at least 80% of the writing as AI-generated. (I’m puzzled as to why the article would have needed any grammatical editing, as the footnote indicates, but I’m still very certain that AI was used; comments are not edited by NancyOnNorwalk and the author’s comment is an even more brazen example of writing that doesn’t appear human or authentic.)

    Norwalk residents deserve a mayor who can structure their thoughts on their own. If this mayoral candidate was any bit serious about building and keeping jobs in Norwalk, he’d hire a real writer or learn how to write. “Smart growth” requires smart people and smart people are able to write a Letter to the Editor of a local news organization without a machine writing, editing, or proofreading it for them.

    1. Paul Lanning

      Political candidates typically have speech writers.

      1. David Muccigrosso

        Not ones running for muni governments in towns of <100k.

Leave a Reply


Recent Comments

Secret Link