Quantcast

Norwalk Council members push back against BoE’s $27M budget ask

Norwalk Public Schools Chief Financial Officer Lunda Asmani presents a chart comparing the City’s fund balance, or “Rainy Day Fund,” to the school district’s carryovers of surplus funds, during a joint Common Council/Board of Education Finance Committees meeting, Thursday on Zoom. Council member David Heuvelman (D-District A) called the chart “disingenuous.”

NORWALK, Conn. — Friction developed in the first discussion between Norwalk Public Schools representatives and Common Council members wrestling with the district’s requested 12.7% operating budget increase, a hoped-for $27.6 million bump up from the 2022-23 budget.

Council members took exception to the phrase “zero funded” when in fact, it was a zero percent increase to the schools budget in 2020-21, not zero in funds. In addition, multiple Council members stressed “needs over wants” and said NPS is just one department in the City and they are concerned about the impact the increase would have on the families that send their children to Norwalk Public Schools.

During previous Board of Education meetings, NPS Chief Financial Officer Lunda Asmani and Norwalk Superintendent of Schools Alexandra Estrella painstakingly detailed the complicated factors supporting the requested increase, but at Thursday’s BoE/Common Council Finance Committee time-strapped joint session, Asmani spent only about 10 minutes explaining the topic. He invited Council members to examine the voluminous budget document available online.

NPS would need an 8.5% increase this year just to maintain its normal trajectory, an increase made more eye-catching due to the use of federal COVID-19 relief dollars to lessen the budget impact on taxpayers, Asmani said, noting that special education costs are mandated and, “Those expenses have not remained flat, they have increased, the number of students needing outside district services has increased, the cost of providing those services has also increased.”

The value of the grants NPS receives to support special education has decreased, while this year’s SpEd costs are $6.3 million higher, he said.  The district budgeted $9 million but will probably spend $10.2 million to cover needs.

Asmani also presented a chart comparing the general fund balance, or “Rainy Day Fund,” to Board of Education year-end surpluses, calling the City’s money “rollover funds.”

Council member David Heuvelman (D-District A) blasted the chart.

“It’s just not an apples-to-apples comparison. And I feel that it’s a disingenuous thing in a public meeting to try to project that idea,” Heuvelman said. Statutorily, the BoE can rollover 2% of its surplus into the next year while the City has siloed departments and “those city agencies are handled in a different way.”

“What we’re not speaking to is the youth that we are serving,” Board of Education Vice Chairman Godfrey Azima said. He’s “probably most concerned” about students’ mental health in the pandemic’s wake.

“Community issues are not siloed in the community, we are one. They play out in our experience all in the school buildings,” Azima said. “…The teachers are experiencing it and it makes it harder for us to do more with less. It shouldn’t be an apples-to-apples discussion, it should be a very detailed discussion around what it is that we’re experiencing that isn’t represented in a clean budget discussion.”

Council member Jenn McMurrer (D-District C), who ran for office in 2021 after  objecting to Council member John Kydes (D-District C) leading a cut to school funding, said she agreed with much of Asmani’s comments. But she said that two NPS initiatives which were funded without City approval (the South Norwalk incubator school paid for with 2021-22 rollover money and the Welcome Center financed by COVID-19 relief funds) were “wonderful ideas,” but are “wants, not needs” now included in the operating budget request. She asked how much both of those projects are costing.

McMurrer wanted to know what contingency plan the district has if it doesn’t get its requested 12.7% operating budget increase because, “I’ve heard rumors that there’s gonna be massive layoffs. I don’t want that to happen…. unfortunately, we can’t write a blank check to every single department in the city.”

Asmani didn’t address a possible contingency plan or the cost of the two new programs. He pointed to the “zero funding” as having an impact and referred to his predecessor’s warnings on the topic, two years in a row.

“The fact that we are where we are now should not come as a surprise to anyone, right? Because we knew when you do 0%, it’s going to catch up to you because one-year deal, two-year deal, it’s going to catch up,” Asmani said.

McMurrer pressed for an explanation, asking why NPS is seeking a 12.7% increase when an 8.5% increase would compensate for the zero increase in 2020-21.

Asmani said the special education increases are not normal expenses. “Then, in all honesty,” NPS did enhance some positions; improvement teachers were added with the relief funds, and the budget is transparent about that, he said.

Council member Diana Révolus (D-District B), mother to a baby and a grown daughter, said, “I think we’re forgetting about the families who have to live and pay for these situations.”

While “it is a great and noble thing to speak on how we need to do for our children,” there are parents who “are wanting to pull out their children from this, go to into home education, or families who want to own homes and want to leave Norwalk,” Révolus said. “…I give all the support to the devout call and talk of our children. But those children come with families and I am 100% behind what councilmember McMurrer said about our wants and our needs.”

Council members have been warned about a coming recession since the budget season NPS got “zero funded,” she said. The requested increase “may be too high,” given the need to be “fair for not only our children, but the family they go home to.”

Estrella said NPS is focused on needs and were originally working from an 18% possible increase. Programs, especially those provided by outside services, were cut, even if school administrators feel they’re needed.

“There were sacrifices made that in the long term might not be always in the best interest of students, particularly because we want to make sure that their social emotional needs are being met,” Estrella said. “… People tend to forget that the pandemic created an array of needs that might have not been there prior to.”

BoE member Kara Nelson Baekey and Azima asked the Council members to watch their recent workshop session focused on mental health survey results.

Norwalk Chief Financial Officer Henry Dachowitz presents information at Thursday’s joint meeting of the Common Council and Board of Education Finance Committees.

Thursday’s joint session began with Norwalk Chief Financial Officer Henry Dachowitz outlining the “challenging economic outlook,” given “stagflation, high inflation plus economic recession.” Interest rates have gone up, the housing market is starting to falter and national firms have announced layoffs.

City departments have been asked to restrain increases to a maximum 3.5%, but some fixed cost budget items are going up 7 to 12%, he said. The City hopes to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) for some things and plans to draw down from the “Rainy Day Fund.”

“There have been migration of taxpayers from Connecticut to low tax states. It’s been offset by some of the migration during COVID from Boston and New York. And at this point, we cannot expect federal state assistance such as the funding we received in the recent past for COVID and the ARPA funding,” he said.

Nelson Baekey asked how low the City’s Rainy Day Fund has been while still maintaining the City’s Triple A bond rating.

It was about $74 million at the end of the last fiscal year and yes, it’s gone up every year Mayor Harry Rilling has been in office, Dachowitz replied. The northeast has different Rainy Day policies than the rest of the country, where the fund balance is commonly equal to 50-75% of the operating budget, and Norwalk’s policy is to ideally maintain a fund balance equal to 7 to 15% of the operating expenses.

It now represents about 18-19% of the budget, Dachowitz said. While he’s recommending a draw down, the challenge is “this coming summer, when we borrow more money, we already have about $350 million of bonds outstanding. Two years ago, our financial advisor calculated that if we have $400 million or more of debt, for our size city, we run the risk of losing our Triple A bond rating.”

He said, “The second major metric is the ratio of our debt service costs. That’s the cost in our annual operating budget of repaying principal and paying interest on our debt. The metric the rating agencies look at for triple A is 10% or lower. We are dangerously close to that 10% already.”

Reminder: NancyOnNorwalk requires full names from commenters. For more information, go here.

Norwalk Chief Financial Officer Henry Dachowitz presents information at Thursday’s joint meeting of the Common Council and Board of Education Finance Committees.

6 comments

Sue Haynie January 17, 2023 at 7:46 am

The BOE budget is obscene.

Blaming special ed again—why doesn’t the Superintendent and BOE provide the public with an assessment of NPS own Dyslexia Center which has been in operation for 5 years? Dyslexia and reading disabilities are one of the largest identifications in SPED under either ‘Specific Learning Disability’ or ‘other health impairment’

Here were the original goals of the Norwalk PS Dyslexia Center:

Goals for the program were laid out more than a year ago in a PowerPoint presentation:

Take interventions that have been reserved for the wealthiest populations and make sure Norwalk teachers are adequately prepared to deliver those same interventions with the same outcomes to all students

Provide Norwalk educators specialized training to identify Dyslexia and develop a comprehensive intervention program

Become a “training center” to provide ongoing teacher training in the area of identification and treatment in the area of Dyslexia

Nora King January 17, 2023 at 10:53 am

Estrella and her overpaid superintendents are going crazy with spending. She spent that money that the majority of taxpayers did not want on the incubator and the Welcome Center. She is not disclosing to parents the pathways, and lotteries and is certainly not focused on academics. This department should be defunded until they get their focus on academics and not social issues. The taxpayers cannot keep funding grand ideas when our kids are not academically prepared.

Michael McGuire January 17, 2023 at 2:17 pm

Is enrollment up? Or down? What groups of students are growing, and which are declining? And over what time period. Ditto the increase in Special Ed – why is that group increasing? Is it due to changes in threshold/measurements? Or population growth? How does ESL fit into this from the budget side and what has its historical tending cost been? How much did the Welcome Center cost? What are the on-going costs of the welcome center and for how long? Should the New HS funding be funneled into maintaining existing budget levels from the next 10 years? 15 years etc.? If not, why? What caused the explosion in students needing nutrition assistance? What is the moral of the teachers over the past and present?

So many questions not being asked.

Bryan Meek January 17, 2023 at 11:09 pm

First blush, take note of the 500s accounts. $10.3 Million for transportation. It was $5.5 MM in 2016. Bussing children all over the city is very expensive. When we are considering the cost of the new SoNo school by the scrapyards that might open in a few years, we should consider that Ely would have been open today and Columbus next year saving millions on this expense on top of the millions in wasted plans and space. More later.

Drew Todd January 18, 2023 at 9:48 am

Let’s just imagine if you will how much money the BOE would get to waste if we didn’t have Bob Duff We Never Asked For High?!!?!? They have ZERO accountability with our money since Estrella has been here! This must stop. They honestly think the tress the City plants are money trees and they don’t care how its gets spent. Let’s be real how much funding has the BOE received the last few years since Estrella has been here?!!? What has she done to prepare which we were warned about falling off the financial cliff has she done or saved?!?! We have a “Welcome Center” Oh Goody! That wasn’t a need. We do need a school and should have had one many many years ago but we all know the BS that it went through and people fought it. So now we are going to build a school on some wasteland industrial area. Yeah great thinking. Estrella and the BOE have shown us time and time again they can’t be trusted with our money! This has to stop! Like everyone else they need to figure a way to make this work with the extra MILLIONS they have received over the last 3 years! I mean never mind our children aren’t being taught Math, Science, English but her WOKE and Equality Policies and where to go to the bathroom. are top of her and the rubber stamp BOE agenda. And it not the teachers fault! The teachers are scared if they teach a lesson 2 minutes over the allowed time in class or set up their classrooms how they want without 1 of the 7/9 I loose count of the Mini Superintendents eating to “Evaluate” Them. The we all know that’s code for write them up. The morale in the schools is horrible and she is the # 1 cause. So many teachers are just up and leaving at the end of the school year and who can blame them. I mean a 4th grader assaults a teacher and the parent response the child doesn’t adjust well. So of course not the kids fault. We have ZERO discipline in the schools. And wait what’s coming down the rode you ask….In the name of “Equality” your children can never fail again!! They can take tests multiple times or just heck pick their grades! Yes this issue is being discussed by an outside group and getting paid?????? More, More Waste..This is one thing Estrella and the BOE are good at. And as a tax payer and YES I have a child still in the schools has to stop! This request of theirs is moronic and we’ve had enough. Oh But wait didn’t Bobby Boy turn around $40 Million with a snap for a pool that will take 10 years to build in his new HS?!?! And speaking of his new HS did you know Bobby Boy sits on the SGC for eternity and is directing all his little wants and desires for his own satisfaction. If you don’t believe me check the minutes of the SGC meetings…But while he’s dreaming about his new HS maybe go and turn around another $20 or so in the name of “Equality” and ask Ned for the cash…Problem Solved Right?!!? I mean for this year at least…

Manny Langella January 19, 2023 at 9:11 am

I remember daring to ask “why” and then we were promptly ousted by our own party via an inside job. Obviously, things discussed in caucus stay in caucus, but it is comical to see one Councilperson, in particular, take the stance he is so vocally taking after always being the dissenting opinion for the public eye. If he had only taken pause he’d have realized what he is seeing now is what we saw. Let this be a lesson that sometimes experience provides an opportunity to learn vs. going on the offensive and being a catalyst in dividing our Council.

I hope the new Councilpersons understand this. Get ready for no one to call you back in the BOE stronghold Districts when it’s nomination time. We were blasted for even daring to say “wants” and “needs”. Heck, Councilperson McMurrer lead the charge against us looking to find balance! Oh, how times have changed.

Remember, it’s always easier to condemn when you don’t have a track record or until you are sitting in the seat you desire.

Please protect our Rainy Day Fund, this has downstream implications to our Bond rating. We shouldn’t be using this yearly to set offset tax burden. That doesn’t solve the root cause of the problem but rather creates a precedent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>