NORWALK, Conn. — Here’s some Norwalk news briefs for you:
- Rilling: No input from Lamont on Walk Bridge design; Waze will help with traffic disruptions
- ‘Neither position is wrong,’ Rilling says about Redevelopment
- Norwalk BoE seeks another chance in Morris lawsuit
- Harbor Keeper awaits federal judge’s decision
Walk Bridge moving ahead
Gov. Ned Lamont caused a bit of a stir here in April when he promised to “take another look at the Walk Bridge,” empathizing with concerns expressed by critics of the massive bridge replacement project.
“I haven’t had a discussion with the governor on the Walk Bridge, nor have any of the Walk Bridge project engineers that I know of,” Mayor Harry Rilling said Tuesday to NancyOnNorwalk.
Not only that, but Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT) Commissioner Joseph Giulietti “indicated that the bridge is moving forward. That’s what we have up until this point,” Rilling said.
There’s already “a lot” of work being done in connection to the Walk Bridge program, he said, mentioning the work on the Ann Street railroad overpass and the Marshall Street railroad bridge.
The Walk Bridge program is inspired by the need to replace the aged railroad bridge over the Norwalk River but includes replacement of all the railroad bridges in Norwalk, work on East Avenue and on the East Norwalk train station, electrification of the Danbury dockyard and the CP243 project, a series of railroad switches north of the Walk Bridge.
Rilling said he is “very encouraged” by ConnDOT’s smooth replacement of an Interstate 95 overpass in Stamford. The complete demolition of the two Route 1 bridge spans was scheduled to close I-95 for two consecutive weekends but the highway was re-opened hours ahead of schedule both times.
“They had minimal disruption and they were completed actually before they anticipated that they’d be completed,” Rilling said. “So, based on the fact that a lot of the Walk Bridge work is underway now and the fact that the actual bridge replacement parts, actual bridge equipment, are being built on a barge upstream and then floated in, I am hopeful and cautiously optimistic that the disruption for the city of Norwalk will be minimized to a great degree.”
The biggest problem will probably be the North Water Street closures but Norwalk has signed on with Waze, a popular travel navigation app used by many to avoid traffic jams, and will be uploading real time data, he said. “That will be part of our wayfinding process.”
Redevelopment Agency hard look?
Norwalk Chief of Staff Laoise King on June 11 asked on behalf of Rilling that the Redevelopment Agency undertake a strategic planning initiative before hiring a replacement for
Norwalk Redevelopment Agency Executive Director Tim Sheehan.
Redevelopment Agency Chairman Felix Serrano said that would happen after the replacement is onboard.
“We disagree on that,” Rilling said Tuesday, downplaying the conflict.
“I think we have an understanding that we will have some participation in the selection process of the new person,” Rilling said, also adding that the City suggested an interim director be in place until the agency’s role could be reevaluated.
The Redevelopment Agency was founded in 1950, following the Housing Act of 1949, the RDA website states.
“While they have done a lot, we need to take a look at what their strategic plan should be now and work together because they have to work together with the city, they have to work with private investors,” Rilling said.
Given that Sheehan is leaving at the end of this week, “This is the time to do it,” Rilling said. However, there are two lines of thought on reevaluating the Agency’s mission and “neither position is wrong.”
A new director can obviously be part of developing a strategic plan or the new director can be selected based how their strengths will help implement a new strategic plan, he explained.
“The bottom line is we need to get the right person in place and make sure that we reevaluate what their purpose should be.”
‘The Court should reconsider’
The City of Norwalk and the Norwalk Board of Education on Monday requested that a Stamford Superior Court judge allow them to reargue their request for summary judgement in the lawsuit filed against them by former Norwalk Public Schools Human Relations Officer Bruce Morris.
Morris, former District 140 State Representative, accuses the defendants of racial discrimination in the elimination of his NPS job. The defendants in April requested summary judgement, a decision issued by the judge instead of by a jury.
“There are substantial material triable issues of fact which can only be addressed by a jury,” Judge Alex Hernandez said on June 3, declining the request.
While the arguments in the half-hour June 3 hearing were focused on emails sent by the-BoE Chairman Mike Lyons in 2015, mentioning a possible “race war” if the “snake” Morris were let go, Monday’s motion uses the 2015 written reprimand issued to Morris as a centerpiece of its argument.
To win a discrimination claim, Morris must prove an adverse employment action and the written warning did not result in a loss of pay or detrimental consequences, Attorney Dennis Durao states.
Hernandez “provided no legal reasoning or rationale” for his decision and, “had the Court at least considered certain arguments presented by defendants,” the law supporting those contentions would have “materially altered” the ruling, Duaro states, arguing that the “seemingly overlooked law” has left the defendants “guessing as to the scope of trial.”
Harbor Keeper, ConnDOT, wait for judge
A hearing was held May 28 in the lawsuit filed by Harbor Keeper, a non-profit citizens group, against the Connecticut Department of Transportation and the Federal Transportation Authority in an attempt to halt the Walk Bridge reconstruction.
Harbor Keeper argues that the State has not adequately established the need for a bridge that opens instead of a fixed bridge, which could be much cheaper. In dueling legal briefs, each side has filed a motion for summary judgment – a request for the court to rule that the other party has no case, according to lawyers.com.
The federal courts website states that the May 28 hearing on these motions lasted 70 minutes. Judge Stefan Underhill has taken the matter under advisement, meaning that he is deliberating, according to USLegal.com.