Quantcast

Norwalk’s pick to lead schools has experience dealing with ups, downs

Norwalk Superintendent Manuel J. Rivera
Manuel J. Rivera is expected to begin work as Norwalk’s next superintendent on July 18.

NORWALK, Conn. – The man who is in line to become Norwalk’s new superintendent of schools is no stranger to Norwalk. He is also no stranger to controversy and internal discord, having experienced his share of both during his 35-year career in education.

The Norwalk Board of Education is expected to confirm the contract to bring Manuel J. Rivera, 61, aboard to lead the school system at its July 9 meeting. BOE Chairman Mike Lyons announced Monday that Rivera and the board had come to a contract agreement and that Rivera would begin work on July 18. According to the board’s contract with the Norwalk Federation of Teachers, the union has four days from the time the board makes its choice to the actual contract signing to study the choice and raise any issues.

Based on reader comments left on NancyOnNorwalk’s story announcing his imminent hiring, Rivera is a popular choice. Other comments have come in as well, including from a Republican candidate for the Board of Education.

“I’m extremely pleased,” Lauren Rosato said Monday night. “I have known of him for several years through national networking with education foundations. He’s a forward thinker with national credibility, and he knows Norwalk. This is a game changer.”

Lisa Thomson, a founder of Norwalk’s Red Apples, concurred.

“I think the Board of Education has hit a home run,” she said. “He has national name recognition, which will help bring funds to Norwalk. He didn’t get frightened away by the Norwalk nonsense. He’s a reformer and he’s got ties to Norwalk. This is only be great things for Norwalk, it’s exactly what we need.”

The raves are similar to those expressed by many in Boston when Rivera was chosen to take over that system in 2007. Instead, five months after accepting the job but with a contract still not worked out, Rivera accepted another job, as deputy secretary of education for New York in the Eliot Spitzer administration. The move left Boston scrambling four months before Rivera was expected to start, and sent the system back to square one in its search.

A story on New York’s Capitol Confidential website announcing Rivera’s appointment said, “Rivera rejected reports that he rejected the Boston job due to the controlling leadership style of the woman who heads the Boston School Committee, and insisted he had decided to accept Spitzer’s offer “because of this unique, unexpected opportunity to impact the lives of 3 million children across the state of New York.”

Rivera outlasted Spitzer, who famously resigned amidst a scandal involving prostitutes, and continued to serve under Gov. David Paterson until Aug. 18, 2008, when he resigned and to take over the Rochester, N.Y., school system. Said Paterson in a press release, “Manny Rivera oversaw the largest infusion of state aid to education in the history of New York. Under his leadership, new education accountability legislation was developed which includes an unprecedented requirement that school districts with low performing schools must complete a Contract for Excellence detailing their investments in proven practices and programs. In addition, he provided oversight to the Commission on Higher Education which developed recommendations to build one of the premier systems of higher education in the nation.

“Manny has accomplished so much for the State of New York over the past eighteen months. In his role as Deputy Secretary of Education, Manny worked tirelessly to demand greater education accountability and provide meaningful reform. In the process, he oversaw the greatest infusion of education aid that our State has ever seen,” said Governor Paterson. “Manny has had a long and successful career serving New York State’s students. After devoting so much of his life to public service, I wish him the best in his future endeavors in the private sector.”

Rivera left his position with the Paterson administration, he said, “I considered going back to being a superintendent, but I had dinner with a colleague and was given the opportunity to start with a company that would focus on school transitions and turnaround services.”

The result was Education Learning Alliance, an umbrella company that includes GEMS Americas, Global Partnership Schools, GEMS Education Solutions and Little GEMS International-Lincoln Park. And while the company has been successful, Rivera said he needed a change of direction.

“After 4½, 5 years of being on the road six days a week, I was ready to settle in again,” he said Monday. “I wanted to find someplace, preferably in Connecticut, and heard Norwalk was looking for a superintendent.”

It’s familiar turf for the former Norwalk resident, who served as superintendent for the city of Rochester, N.Y., on to separate occasions. The first, from 1991 to 1994, came after working in the district as a teacher and administrator since 1975. He left to take a management position with Edison Schools, a company that managed public school systems. The company had gone through ups and downs prior to his arrival, and suffered through more before he left in 2002 to return to Rochester.

During his second run in Rochester, he gained accolades including state and national Superintendent of the Year awards.

Rivera comes to Norwalk with his eyes wide open, aware of the discord surrounding the BOE and the union.

“It’s not something I’m tremendously worried about,” he said.

“I did my homework,” he said. “I know about the sniping, the types of issues” that are on the table. “I come at this with the belief that we all need to work together … to do what’s right for the students and the schools.”

He also said it’s important to develop an atmosphere that is supportive of the teachers to allow them to do their jobs.

“When I started in Rochester, you wouldn’t believe the tension. There was not a lot of confidence and respect” in the city for the school system, he said. “You have to stay focused on doing the right thing for the students, finding the right ground rules,” so that everyone knows what to expect. “You need to have people working together, not only the teachers but the community and the government.”

To that end, he said, he has already had a “very good conversation” with NFT head Bruce Mellion and with other local leaders.

“Norwalk is a great city. … I loved it when I was there,” Rivera said.

“I’m really quite excited about it.”

Rivera Background Materials

Comments

16 responses to “Norwalk’s pick to lead schools has experience dealing with ups, downs”

  1. Lifelong Teacher

    I am optimistic.

  2. Joe Espo

    Of course you’re optimistic. You stand to get more of our tax money in your wallet.
    .
    http://blogs.democratandchronicle.com/rochester/?p=1115
    .

  3. norwalkresidentteacher

    So, Joe Espo, are you suggesting our financially conservative BOE has neglected to fully research this man, or is it perhaps a one-sided argument offered by someone that looks to find the negative in all situations?

  4. M. Murray’s

    http://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/23/nyregion/big-raises-agreed-on-for-rochester-teachers.html

    Seems like he expects more out of staff but is willing to pay for it. Maybe we can accomplish improvement and keep staff happy at the same time.

  5. Suzanne

    $23,500 (+/-) and $70,000 were the teacher salary 1987 figures given in M. Murray’s second article referenced from the New York Times, representing a 40% increase over three years. Mr. Espo, check the salary figures for teachers in the City of Norwalk then report back to us remembering that they are entrusted with the lives of our children and the good development of their minds and bodies. With that trust, I would rather our tax payments went to education of our children than to needless “improvements” on behalf of City Hall, like Oak Hills.

  6. Joe Espo

    I just can’t wrap my head around this BOE’s decision to hire a free spending teachers-on-the-dole 12 months pay for 9 months work – summers off-hand-out expert. My income is going down, and I have to be punished so that I have to decide between eating dog food and giving teachers a free summer-long filet mignon dinner? Where’s the justice?

  7. Joe Espo

    @ResidentNorwalkTeacher: This BOE is finacially conservative? They gave away health benefits for ex-spouses? So I have to subsidize a teacher’s alimony payments? Who in God’s name came up with this idea?

  8. 0ldtimer

    “on the dole” ? Last I heard anyone use that very old term it referred to people on welfare, unable to work.
    Joe Espo apparently has no respect for what teachers do to earn their salaries. It is pretty obvious he never tried teaching and has no fond memories of his time as a student. That is so sad. His only concern with public education is what it cost. He clings to the idea it should be done on the cheap by dedicated volunteers. I wonder if his job, whatever it is, gets done that way.

  9. Joe Espo

    @Oldtimer. Not arguing that public school teachers – their union – should do their job on the cheap; just not on the gouge. Although my teachers at Catholic schools did it with ever so much more competence and dedication without the likes of Bruce Mellion. Those teachers were hall of fame material. Dedicated. Sainted. Pedasteled. And priveleged to notch-up innumerable hits at educating successful students.

  10. Joe Espo

    Up top in this article, the juxtaposition of Manny Rivera’s picture with the City Hall Directory sign is just too rich. The sign next to Manny’s face pic says “payroll” and “insurance”. The sign points right in the direction where we Norwalk taxpayers are going to be slammed and slimed: more payroll and more health insurance costs. Read on:
    .
    http://www.13wham.com/news/local/story/RCSD-Top-Officials-Pay-Rising/aa13OBRPI061cATjvuatYw.cspx

    .
    Hold on to your wallets. Tell the Board of Ed that we seniors need some tax relief.

  11. LWitherspoon

    @Joe Espo and M. Murray’s
    .
    I’m puzzled by your comments. Does the new superintendent even have the authority to increase anyone’s pay or benefits without BoE approval?

  12. Mike Lyons

    Folks, the superintendent has no authority to set anyone’s salary or benefits; those are exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Board of Education. I know past Boards have been anything but fiscally responsible, but the present Board majority IS. We just adopted a budget that begins rebuilding the school system even though it is only 1.74% bigger than last year’s (smaller growth than the rate of inflation). We have negotiated or arbitrated contracts that are bringing the growth in salaries and benefits (85% of our budget) under control. We have a new CFO who is working on our first multi-year budgeting process. We can’t correct overnight all the financial problems that developed in our school system over decades, but we’ve made a good start. And Dr. Rivera is well aware of the fiscal constraints we operate under in Norwalk.

  13. LWitherspoon

    @Mike Lyons
    Thank you for clarifying. Thank you also for your response to my previous question in the other article about the vetting process. In your response you stated that the BoE had detailed background checks performed on the finalists. Who performed the checks and what did they entail?
    .
    I think it would be helpful if many of the commenters here and elsewhere would stop projecting their fears, their dreams, and their predictions of failure onto the new superintendent and simply wish him well as he prepares to take on a big and demanding job. The BoE appears to have found the perfect Superintendent, on paper at least. Instead of asking “What will he do for me?”, let’s ask “What can we do for him?” to welcome him back to Norwalk and support his very important work.

  14. marjoriem

    A bad grade for the Rochester City School District means bad news for city taxpayers. The audit was done by State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli.

    DiNapoli says it shows a lack of oversight between 2002 and 2006 allowed former superintendent Manny Rivera to grant more than $164,000 in documented bonuses and raises and $36-million dollars to be paid to contractors without the required supervisor review.

    http://seanpcollins.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/all-over-new-york-nurse-mary-jane-mayoral-control-bad-superintendents-and-switchin-mayors/#comments

  15. marjoriem

    http://rochesterhomepage.net/fulltext?nxd_id=150742

    The audit also claims that millions of dollars in capital projects were spent without proper review. The audit says that opens up the potential that those dollars were spent on something other than district expenses.

    Travel costs were also brought up in the audit. The audit claims Manny Rivera and the former CEO of business services spent $14,400 in excessive travel expenses, and paid a consultant $390,000 even though staff continually raised red flags about the consultant’s traveling to unapproved conferences. – See more at: http://rochesterhomepage.net/fulltext?nxd_id=150742#sthash.WaOi1hkY.dpuf

Leave a Reply


Recent Comments