Opinion: Promises made, promises broken — Part 2

Toni Boucher is a Connecticut businesswoman and former District 26 State Senator.

“You’ve got to be very careful if you don’t know where you are going, because you might not get there.”  

— Yogi Berra.

Businesses and high wage earners are leaving the state, and there are increased taxes on the middle class. No wonder people at all levels of the economic ladder have lost faith in their government. With such an anti-business climate, and so many broken promises, GE may not be the only company headquarters to leave.Major employers are feeling that their best interests are not being served by Hartford and are looking for a better business environment elsewhere.  In fact, the state’s largest business, UTC, is now eyeing the door for Massachusetts, seeking a friendlier business climate just over the border. It moved its Carrier headquarters out of Connecticut already.

Promises Made, Promises Broken

  • The promise to install tolls only on trucks:

One of the most controversial and hotly debated proposals in Hartford is the reinstalling of tolls. The governor promised tolls would only apply to trucks, but has reneged. The regressive toll proposal affects all vehicles on every major highway.  The new administration has vowed to call a special session to vote on a toll bill against massive opposition (lacking the votes to pass it during regular session). Note that Connecticut has double the taxes than other states with tolls such as the car property tax.  *Tolls would also add significantly to the cost of doing business.

  • The promise to lockbox transportation funds:

The voters passed a constitutional amendment to lockbox all transportation funds to protect them from diversion. However, the budget diverts $170 million in new car sales tax slated for special transportation to general fund. So much for the lockbox!

  •  The promise to balance the budget:

The budget just passed is based on $450 million savings that do not exist and on union contracts yet to be negotiated and approved by the unions.  The budget depends on pension deferral and healthcare plan changes still not approved. There is more spending of over 5 percent in just the next two years.

  • The promise to secure union concessions:

The administration was unable to secure the cost-of-living-adjustment savings budgeted. Instead it approved 12 contracts that included 19,000 bonuses and added $100 million more to the budget.  The contracts locked in higher wages and benefits of up to 11 percent and job protection for up to 10 years in some the highest government sector costs in the U.S. Fringe costs are so high that our universities can no longer pay them and have asked them to be paid by the general fund.

  • The promise to reform pension and unfunded liabilities:

Connecticut’s pensions are 30 percent funded.  They should be 80 percent funded.  Pension and debt obligations are one-third of state expenditures and keep expanding.  Instead of converting to 401 contribution plans, the status quo has been maintained by the administration.  It is refinancing teachers’ pension and pushing out payments to 2023 at huge interest costs to taxpayers of $27 billion. This is the second time in three years that pension payments have been refinanced.

  • The promise to put Connecticut on a “debt diet:”

The administration gave big money for union raises and gifts to some legislators’ favorite organizations to get votes for the budget.  The Democratic leadership passed spending millions of dollars in bonding for three little leagues, the YMCA, 4-H clubs, one Boy Scout troop, farmers market, arts festivals,  theater grants and tennis programs.

Yet, they could not give struggling human-service nonprofits the vital funding needed to function that they pleaded for.  The final budget does not include any increase for the nonprofit community that serves 500,000 people through some 1,200 contracts with the state.  This hard-working group takes care of the most vulnerable population in our state.


Other broken promises include the diversion of tobacco settlement and Green Energy funds and this year’s threat to our state parks programs to plug budgets shortfall.  Furthermore, the income, real estate, gasoline percentage tax, inheritance and gift and many other taxes were pledged to be temporary taxes but were made permanent.  No wonder people have grown distrustful.

Pioneer Institute advises the state of Massachusetts, “Connecticut provides a real-world, sobering example of how a seemingly attractive tax-the-rich scheme can backfire badly on a state, turning rosy projections of revenue gains to real-life losses, and damaging business confidence in the process.”

Take heed, those who govern.  The consequences of broken promises are not only loss of trust but loss of top companies and jobs, jobs that Connecticut desperately needs to keep.  Change your ways and keep your promises.  We can still turn things around and restore Connecticut, but time is running out.

This op-ed originally appeared on CTViewpoints.org.


3 responses to “Opinion: Promises made, promises broken — Part 2”

  1. Piberman

    CT’s business community fully understands CT’s future – a State dedicated to “tax and spend”. No matter the consequences. That’s why they’re very reluctant to invest here. Witness the vacant office space in our only vibrant City – Stamford and surrounding towns. And CT’s wealthy citizens fully understand our future. That’s why we have 4,000 + Gold Coast homes for sale. Anyone visit Westport – see the homes for sale. Awesome.

    But the rest of CT’s population is slower to catch on. That’s why there’s been no protest over the current “tax and spend” new CT biennial budget. That CT has been faltering for an entire decade amidst the nation’s most vigorous economic post-War boom ought enlighten the public.

    So what’s the solution ? Would electing new party time Legislators help ? Who knows. What might just help is changing to a full time Legislature, offering good salaries and ample professional staff. And then electing candidates who could pass college freshman economics and finance exams. Not so easy. Without Legislators who are not up to speed on basic economics and finance CT will continue to decline.

  2. Ken

    I love when the tax and spend Republicans talk about what a mess CT is. The one thing they forget to mention is they created the problem. In regards to Boucher she never accomplished a thing while in office and all she did was complain just like she is doing now.

  3. Piberman


    CT’s economic and fiscal problems extend back many decades. So its not just a “CT Democratic problem”. But our new Governor, who reportedly has talked recently with many of the State’s business leaders, persists in continuing the long discredited “tax and spend” policies that have given us the nation’s only decade long stagnant State economy with a major Exodus receiving national attention. So its become a “CT Democratic problem”. And likely to remain so for the foreseeable future in our One Party State.

    What would you have Republicans in Hartford do ? Given how Hartford runs the GOP Legislators might as well take off on permanent summer holiday. The sad reality is that every well known economic and financial analyst sees bleak days ahead for CT. The next national Recession will be an eye opener.
    Ultimately people vote with their feet. Exploring Zilllow for homes on the market and recent sales is an eye opener. We have more homes for sale in our Gold Coast than at any time since the Great Recession.
    Wealthy residents usually get the “economics” right. CT has bad “economics”. With no easy fix available.

Leave a Reply

Recent Comments