Quantcast

What does Supreme Court’s personal home care worker decision mean for Connecticut?

HARTFORD, Conn. – In a ruling that could impact Connecticut’s unions, the U.S. Supreme Court found Monday that personal care attendants in Illinois are not “full-fledged” state employees and can’t be compelled to pay public sector union dues.

The justices ruled 5-4 in Harris v. Quinn that home health care workers in Illinois who are paid through Medicaid but who work for private individuals are not subject to the law that requires public sector workers to pay unions for their representation. That law had clear boundaries in that it applied only to public sector workers, Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion.

“Extending those boundaries to encompass partial-public employees, quasi-public employees, or simply private employees would invite problems,” he wrote.

The Illinois case could have ramifications here Connecticut, where home care attendants voted in 2012 to have SEIU District 1199 represent them in collective bargaining with the state under a similar arrangement.

See the complete story at CT News Junkie.

Comments

One response to “What does Supreme Court’s personal home care worker decision mean for Connecticut?”

  1. John Hamlin

    The state should not be forcing anyone to pay union dues.

Leave a Reply


Recent Comments